I've mentioned how much of a French New Wave fanboy I am - our college film society had a couple of great series on New Wave. So of course I wanted to see Nouvelle Vague (2025), Richard Linklater's fim about the making of Breathless.
It stars Guillaume Marbeck as Jean-Luc Godard, a writer for the French movie journal Cahiers du Cinema. He is watching a recent movie with a group of other critics, like Truffaut and Chabrol. Back at the office, he wonders why no one from Cahiers was going to Cannes to see Truffaut's first movie, 400 Blows. After some office banter, he steals some office petty cash and head off to Cannes.
He becomes desparate to make his own movie. He can't get a producer interested in Une Femme est une Femme, but gets the go-ahead for a gangster film from a treatment by Truffaut. He casts Jean-Paul Belmondo (Aubry Dullin) as the lead, and gets Jean Seberg (Zoey Deutch) to play the American girl he falls for.
But his directorial style is more than peculiar. He likes to play pinball more than shoot, and days go by with only one take for one shot filmed. He just wants to wait for the perfect take, even if it isn't very perfect. He ignores continuity, eye lines, and the 180 rule. He films too many closeups and not enough coverage. It will be impossible to edit together. Belmondo will never work again and Seberg wants off the picture. Her last film was directed by noted sadist and perfectionist Otto Preminger, and this is a worse experience. Godard won't direct, except telling the actors to do less, or just do what they want.
The film is a rousing success. His fellow critics tell him, "Eh. It's no Citizen Kane." Then they heartily congratulate him.
This is a fun film for fanboys in a number of ways. First, it's in black and white and has a very New Wave feel. The actors chosen for the main roles, mostly unknown, are credible representations of the real life people they are portraying. I would have recognized Marbeck as Godard even if he wasn't labelled, and he isn't the most recognizable person. Dullin doesn't quite have Belmondo's swagger, even if he does have the nose (prosthetic?). Deutch makes a good Seberg, although I don't see the intensity I expected. I guess that's acting.
The range of characters from the milieu is enormous, and they are all labelled onscreen when they appear. So we get to see Truffaut, Chabrol, Agnes Varda, Jean Cocteau, Roberto Rosselini, and on and on. When Rosselini is giving a talk, the names in the audience just go on and on, ten or twenty of them. I can just here the applause each one gets in a movie theater (with the right audience).
I'm not sure how non-fanboys would find this. Godard is shown as a major jerk, although maybe talented. The parade of historic New Wave personages would just be vaguely familiar namesWOuld the look of the film be beautifully nostalgic or just old and weird? Was the Dullin/Deutch connection strong enough to pull the viewer in, like Belmondo and Seberg? Was the tale of underappreciated genius compelling?
I don't know - I'm a fanboy, and probably anyone who reviews this is too. So, enough for me.